Daily Racing Form

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          


Crist Blog | July 26, 2008Print

Day 4: 7/26/08

1:10 pm: Happy Whitney Day, unless you've ingested the Kool Aid and want to call it Breeders' Cup Challenge Day.

Three early scratches in the stakes races. As expected, Spring Waltz is out of the Go For Wand, as is Inside Passage, who would have been 30-1. The other defection is Bustin Stones from the Vanderbilt, after the undefeated 4-year-old came up with a stone bruise.

His defection seriously alters the complexion of the race. Whether you liked him or not (I was against), his defection reduces the likelihhod of a kamikaze speed duel with Black Seventeen, who has run sub-22 opening quarters in his last four starts. There still could be an early scramble if E Z Warrior guns from the outside and if Sammarco can keep up early, but Black Seventeen's prospects of dominating the pace and the race are now much stronger.

In the opener, Benny the Waiter ($9.90) blasted clear of 7-10 Rollers early to gain an uncontested lead through a moderate half-mile and had enough left to hold him off when the favorite tried to come through on the rail. Coa, riding the winner, kept things tight but legal on the favorite, who was making his first start since October. Rollers didn't look comfortable trying to come through on the inside, but should have been able to reel him in with his best effort.

The track looks pretty quick, as Benny the Waiter stopped the timer in 1:09.74.

3:00 pm: Seemed like old times as a big-ticket Coolmore/Pletcher/Velazquez firster made a splashy debut. Munnings ($4.10), a $1.7 million 2-year-old-in-training purchase "looked like a million...maybe a million-seven!" as Tom Durking put it in his call, shooting to the lead and turning back an intense challenge from well-meant (3-1) Zito firster Just a Coincidence to score by 4 1/4 lengths in 1:09.94. Just a Coincidence had another 5 1/4 on Sean Avery. Munnings is by first-crop sire (and former Pletcher trainee) Speightstown from the unraced Holy Bull mare La Comete.

In the 3rd, a turf race for older maidens, Baronial (Kingmambo-Personal Ensign) was a solid winnner for Phipps/McGaughey. Baronial is the final foal of the pensioned Personal Ensign, who also produced Miner's Mark, Our Emblem and My Flag.

In the 4th, Unbridled Heart, the $1 million Godolphon colt who won his debut by 10 lengths on the Peter Pan undercard, suffered his second odds-on defeat since then when he fell a neck short of catching Acai ($26.20).

3:45 pm: I wrote the following at the bottom of the Saturday newspaper column:

The New York State Racing and Wagering Board took one small step toward allowing New York to join the 21st Century world of wagering this week when it granted Saratoga the right to offer superfecta wagering on any “qualifying” race instead of the previous limit of three per day. Now it’s time to get rid of those qualifications, ancient and indefensible restrictions which could be said to have outlived their usefulness had there ever been anything useful about them.
First is the requirement that a race must have eight starters for the track to offer a superfecta. This was the face-saving fruit ofa 30-year-old harness race-fixing investigation, and it made no sense then or now. The second is a prohibition on coupled entries in superfecta races, instituted because some ill-informed and long-departed board functionary thought that horseplayers would be confused if both #1 and #1a finished in the top four in a race. There is not a horseplayer alive who does not understand that you go to the fifth-place finisher to complete the winning super combo in such cases, just as you go to the fourth-place finisher to complete a trifecta combination when two parts of an entry in the top three.

If the Board needs any further proof of the idiocy of this rule, look at what happened in today's 6th race. It was one of the juiciest races on many a card, with a field of 14 older maidens and plenty of live-looking longshots. A perfect candidate for superfecta wagering, and one was scheduled. Then, when there was an early scratch from the body of the race, an also-eligible drew in -- but because he was coupled with another horse in the race, meaning there was now both a 1 and 1a in the field, track officials had to cancel the superfecta

In addition to needlessly depriving fans of the bet, the rule puts the track in the bad position where it would have been to their advantage to scratch the also-eligible horse in order to have a superfecta. Just a bad deal all around.

0-for-20 Joppa Flat's lit up the tote board at $70.00 in the 6th, and if it's possible for an 0-for-20 winner to be an overlay, he was it. Unlike, say, Worth a Shot here on Thursday, Joppa Flat's had run very competitively at the level time and again and his eight second-place finishes included runner-up performances behind decent horses such as Winstrella, Communicator and Merchant Marine. He ran in a nearly identical version of this race here last summer, finishing second at 5-2.

5:00 pm:In my book, Forever Together was way too big a price winning the Diana at 9-1 while Abraaj was no bargain taking the Vanderbilt at 8-5.

Forever Together was coming off a fast-closing third to Ventura and Lady of Venice in the Just a Game last time out, a race with a relatively slow pace (46.55) considering the blistering final time (1:32.75). Forever Together came flying late into the fast final fractions. Seven of the 10 fillies in the Diana were under 10-1 and Forever Together somehow got lost in the shuffle.

The Vanderbilt had a "formful" result but seemed like an oddly-run race all around. Black Seventeen was outrun early by Sammarco, then he prompted the leader into a 44.57 half, setting the stage for the closers. Abraaj looked like he wasn't kicking in, then finally lumbered up on the outside and won by 2 1/4 lengths, but his winning time of 1:10.23 was shockingly slow -- given that the day's first two races (a statebred allowance and a 2-year-old maiden race) both broke 1:10.

The skies are darkening here, a bit earlier than the weathermen had predicted, and we could still have a different track by the time the Whitney rolls around.


5:30 pm: Ginger Punch ($2.40) was so much better than her five opponents in the Go For Wand that she managed to win despite being bottled up and repeatedly shut off before finally finding a seam with a furlong to go and winning far more impressively than her slow time of 1:53.43 and 1 1/4-length margin would suggest. It's not going to be a picnic making figs for this card.

The track took a few minutes of showers before the race, but now the sun's back out with 18 minutes to post for the Whitney.

6:45 pm:I'm an unabashed Commentator fan of long standing, so forgive me for beaming. That was pretty cool. The 7-year-old gelding, who held off eventual Horse of the Year Saint Liam to win this race three years ago, was in good position after getting clear through an opening quarter in 24.18, as an expected early challenge from Tasteyville never materialized, and he just kept going. He opened up each time anyone got near him and drew away through the stretch to win by 4 3/4 over Student Council, who had another 8 1/4 on Grasshopper.

Commentator, the first horse since Kelso to win the Whitney twice and the oldest since Kelso won it for a third time as an 8-year-old in 1965, has a 2008 resume that's looking pretty impressive. He won two Gulfstream sprints by a combined 27 3/4 lengths, was a gallant second in the Met Mile and now won the Whitney by daylight. He's the only horse in at least a decade besides Ghostzapper to have run three Beyers of 119 or higher. With all due respect to win and Funny Cide, Commentator is probably the best New York-bred ever.

The $442.50 all-stakes pick-4 payoff was pretty generous considering it was a virtual pick-3, that Abraaj was favored and Commentator was the ML favorite and second actual betting choice.

And thanks to Lyke a Hurricane's victory at 12-1 in the nightcap, we finally have a carryover at Saratoga 2008! There's $120,938 waiting for us tomorrow, and it doesn't look easy. I'll try to make some sense of it by 10:45 a.m. tomorrow, when I'll be doing the Siro's seminar with Harvey Pack and "Cajun Racing" author Ed McNamara.

Posted by Steven Crist Jul 26, 2008 1:11:08 PM | Permalink



Keywords:



Comments



clifton_p_juarez_ says:

After Bevy's Best destroys the field in the Amadevil at the Columbus Races and wins his fifth in a row at six to seven furlongs, he will be supplemented to the BCS Sprint and win at astronomical odds, perhaps as high as 847-1. This horse is a killer. Wiley Owner Dr. Timeoteo I. Munson de Pascua and veteran trainer Larry Staroscik have waited for this day to sucker the racing world. You heard it hear first folks.

Posted by Clifton P. Juarez.. Aug 5, 2008 8:03:49 AM



tony says:

While I was highly impressed by Commentator, I think he's only an equal to the best of all time. Win, Fourstardave/Fourstar's Allstar (they're interchangable) and the mismanaged Funny Cide certainly qualify for the debate---poor Win doesn't get much respect anymore.

Posted by Tony Jul 28, 2008 3:09:51 AM



hay_oats_water says:

regarding stewarts comments,

there is no way commentator could win the derby or preakness, NEVER! horses today are blown apart by the triple crown. if funny cide was carefully handled the way commentator is it is much more possible for him to win the races commentator has won than for commentator to win the races funny cide has won.

Posted by hay oats water Jul 27, 2008 9:02:41 PM



silver_charm says:

Steve,

Forever Together in the winners circle at 9-1 looks juicy after race but before now that is a different story.

Several Graded winners were sitting at 6-1 and 7-1 and some of them were Grade One winners. Forever Together was at best a nice looking turf prospect with only two starts on turf. Coming off a fast closing third in the Just A Game. 9-1 was about right and good for you if you had her.

Double Thumbs up to your New York Handicapper pro Dave Litfin who made Forever Together his selection in print BEFORE the race, not AFTER like you did. Shame on you.

I agree on Commentator. We give to much adulation and attention to the here today gone tomorrow 3YO. When he is on he is special.

Enjoy the blog. Seems like it started about a year ago now with the Whitney timer problem. Don't ever stop.

A fan. Silver Charm

Posted by Silver Charm Jul 27, 2008 7:51:02 PM



larry_thiel says:

I only bet on Dominguez when he's riding a favorite.
When he's on a fourth or fifth choice he looks remarkably uninterested in trying hard.
Maybe that's just a bad impression I have.

Posted by Larry Thiel Jul 27, 2008 2:39:48 PM



sero says:

arcstats,

Have to disagree with your take on the Tyro. The Tyro favorite scratched out of Saratoga a few days prior with a temp and was not probably 100% to begin with. Second ....are you looking for the horse to go 21 flat(in an attempt to gut out the other 2..perhaps)?? Third, based on the circumstances had Trujillo gone to the stick earlier, it appeared he would have been blown by anyway. I'm a fan of 27 yrs (prob as old as you) and I do agree with your take on Prado with a number of "brain dead...no perseverance" rides elsewhere. Good luck in the SHOWdown. Always see your name on the leaderboard. Took it down twice (w/a 3rd) for $50k. Its a great contest.

Posted by sero Jul 27, 2008 11:52:27 AM



stewart says:

Steve:

The track program listed a superfecta for Race 6 notwithstanding the coupled entry. When I went to bet the race yesterday, it took 4 clubhouse tellers before I could find someone to correctly explain to me why there was no superfecta on the race. Truly stupid rule!!

P.S. Regarding hay oats water's comments on Funny Cide, FC was good for 6 weeks as a 3yo and was a glorified NYB allowance horse by the time he was a 6yo. A very good horse, yes, but he couldn't carry Commentator's jock.

Posted by Stewart Jul 27, 2008 11:30:43 AM



bob_m says:

had exacta and triple with joppa flats.. but did not bet to win due to 0-20..

was annoyed triple only paid 1500.. any thoughts as to why? 34-1 over 4-1 over 8-1 with fav out..

i like kevazinga in 3rd today, if he can beat city roar.. rice has working bullets.

i also like bella attrice in the 7th, as long as it is on the turf..

also you and i forever could wire the field to get kent 5000...

good luck to all.. 5th straight day at the spa..

Posted by bob m. Jul 27, 2008 11:09:32 AM



grasslover says:

Hey AndyScoggin- Best of luck to you as you continue to "survive". I was knocked out on openeing day when I used Collegiate in the filly feature. With the lead turning for home, and 6/5 Ocean Colors quickly dropping back to what would be last place, my "survivor selection" got beat by three bombs who, on paper, didn't stand a chance. Nothing like a totally implausible ending of a race to take the wind out of my sails a whole 4 hours after the contest started. In retrospect, I should have bet another $10 and taken the "under" on how long I'd last in this contest! LOL. Continued good luck and keep on keepin' on.

Posted by grasslover Jul 27, 2008 10:31:06 AM



jk says:

I hit the late pick 3 ($173) at the Spa which paid $68 less than the late double ($241). Ginger Punch provided negative value in the first leg. I will skip the 1-10 shots in the first leg from now on.

Posted by jk Jul 27, 2008 9:57:10 AM



shivas says:

I got the feeling that Elvis Trujillos' ride on the 1-9 shot in the Tyro at Monmouth had to be of trainer Wesley Wards' making....I agree that was a terrible ride but anytime you see a ride of that sort you gotta think the Trainer wanted to see just how much heart his horse really has rather than trying to win the race at all costs...it looked to me like a $65,000 planned public workout gone bad

Posted by shivas Jul 27, 2008 7:44:25 AM



mike says:

It is mindboggling that someone actually blamed Dominguez for his ride on Rollers.

Posted by Mike Jul 27, 2008 2:06:37 AM



dan_mackenzie says:

The comment from July 11 at Belmont says that R Fast Favorite "Threw down the gauntlet" and was a "mighty handy winner".

Claimed that day.

Interesting.

Posted by Dan MacKenzie Jul 27, 2008 12:17:14 AM



walt_parker says:

I agree on the superfecta rule:

The only reason I think the rule is in place is the concern if two or more coupled entries were in a superfecta race, and both halves of both entries finished in the top four that you would then have to go to the sixth place finisher, or even a seventh or eighth place finisher if there were three or four horse entries, or two or more entries. While that might be confusing to a few, it almost never actually comes up, and not allowing supers in races with coupled entries for the handful (if that many) times that could come up in a given year is very silly.

One thing I would like to see tried is a 10-cent pick nine. This is a wager I actually played several times when Balmoral Park (a harness track in the Chicago suburbs) offered it, and especially on days with races you can single, the 10-cent increments allow players on even a small budget to try for a significant score, especially if there is a decent carryover.

Posted by Walt Parker Jul 26, 2008 9:22:11 PM



virgin_queen says:

arcstats
couldnt agree more with what u said.i started cursing when i saw the way he was being ridden when nearing the 8th pole.i said this guys thinks hes out 4 a sunday drive.he totally fell asleep at the wheel.if i was the owner/tr

Posted by Virgin Queen Jul 26, 2008 9:20:00 PM



hay_oats_water says:

commentator? funny cide won the derby, preakness, jockey club gold cup. 105,000 fans for the belmont also. $ won is not even close. funny cide top nyb hands down!!!

Posted by hay oats water Jul 26, 2008 8:50:25 PM



c says:

When are players finally going to let go of this silly notion that uncoupled entries indicate some kind of devious trainer "intent"?

Does anyone think Asmussen really cares which one of his entries is a longer price on the tote board? Does he instruct the rider of the shorter price to throw the race, while giving the magic wings to the longer one? If he thinks the longer price is so great, why would he bother wasting the time/energy to run the shorter one in the first place? Wouldn't an extra body just get in the way?

Trainers enter horses in races for which they are eligible. Sometimes, a trainer might have multiple horses with similar eligibility restrictions. There are only so many such races (age/sex/distance/surface/conditions) carded in the local condition book during any week. What's a trainer supposed to do if 2 similar horses are tearing down the barn doors, eager to run? He's going to place them in whatever race becomes available. If the horses are really becoming restless, he may enter them in the same race just to fill it.

I'd love to see a stat, over several years, about which half of an uncoupled trainer entry wins more often. I'll bet everything I have the shorter half wins more than the longer half.

Posted by C Jul 26, 2008 8:46:15 PM



jimf says:

How about the late double paying $241 and the late pick 3 only $173.
Is that correct or does the chart have it inverted?

Posted by jimf Jul 26, 2008 7:41:05 PM



ross_b says:

Steve,

I loved Commentator's performance in the Whitney today as well. I was here three years ago when he did the same thing against Saint Liam. Of course, if there was a horse of Saint Liam's quality in the race today, Commentator's final furlong of 13+ seconds may not have carried the day. Moot point, he's a gutsy horse.

Trying to decipher the speed bias and the effects of the rain on the final two Grade I's, was the Whitney as slow as the final time indicated?

Posted by Ross B Jul 26, 2008 7:20:53 PM



patrick says:

With all due respect to Commentator, Mr. Right was arguably the best New York-bred ever. Only one of four horses to win the Santa Anita Handicap and Woodward in the same year (Alysheba, Spectacular Bid and Affirmed were the others), he also captured the Suburban and three straight runnings of the Trenton.

Posted by Patrick Jul 26, 2008 6:54:49 PM



andyscoggin says:

I loved Abraaj in the Vanderbilt, but knew with Bustin Stones out the price would be too short. Found the payday with Forever Together in the Diana for $51.20 DD. Then with a 7x1x1x5 for $35 late pick 4 ticket, caught a $221 payday!

And even though it is meaningless at this point, I am the leader of the Saratoga ShowDown!

Having fun with SAR from NJ.

Good luck to all!

Posted by AndyScoggin Jul 26, 2008 6:34:33 PM



charles_langer says:

Bob Grant:
I thought it was smart of Dominguez actually, to lay off THREE other horses on the lead.

Posted by Charles Langer Jul 26, 2008 6:05:52 PM



rickh says:

"The second is a prohibition on coupled entries in superfecta races"

I was wondering why there was no Superfecta being offered on a race with an unusual-for-Saratoga 14 horse field (I've only seen 14 in races like The Test). This is what those who are looking for a good pay-off are looking for.

Now I know.

I agree, that it's an evil rule which should be changed. Somebodies should write the dinosaurs at the NYSRWB about that.

Bet that would have made some super players a few dozen thousand if they had offered it. Which would have meant thousands for dime players.

Posted by rickh Jul 26, 2008 4:59:05 PM



ejs says:

And Joppa Flats was a turnback who had the lead at today's distance in his last.

When you're right, you're right. On some level I can understand not having superfectas with less than eight betting interests, if only because I wonder if less than eight betting interests can sustain fair value in both the trifecta and superfecta pools. But not having superfectas because the bettors might be confused by entries seems a rule written by people who need instructions to put their socks on in the morning.

Posted by ejs Jul 26, 2008 4:43:56 PM



arcstats says:

For all the younger handicappers out there, check out today's running of the Tyro at Monmouth to see a classic example of jockey styles - today's versus old school. Elvis Trujillo aboard the 1-9 shot in a 3 horse field, rode the horse like it was a Wednesday morning workout. Joe Bravo, on the winner, rode his ass off. Trujillo is the classic example of so many of today's jockeys who ride their mounts like they are thier pet ponies. It's become a sickening trend that continues to grow, all in the name of the "safety of the horse".

If you asked 100 people who've never seen a horse race to watch this race and tell you which jockey was trying to win the race and which one wasn't, the verdict would be 100-0 in favor of Bravo. It's an easy choice when you see Trujillo's feet "in the dash" for 3/4's of the race and not even ask the horse for anything until Bravo had gone by him, and even then it was sooo fake.

What's worse is that many of the older jocks are moving to this style - just pay close attention to Prado's rides for several weeks when they're not at Saratoga.

Posted by Arcstats Jul 26, 2008 4:05:09 PM



bob_grant says:

Steve,
After Ramon's uninspired ride on Rollers in the first, you must be glad Harvey Pack Coerced you into changing your "WestPt.Pick of the Day" to #12,Carry On The Dream in the 11th@Saratoga today..Swami name, perhaps?- Bombs Away!

Posted by Bob Grant Jul 26, 2008 3:25:12 PM



Comments to this entry are closed.

About

Steven Crist has been the Publisher and a columnist for Daily Racing Form since 1998. Previously, he covered racing for The New York Times from 1981-1990; was founding editor-in-chief of The Racing Times in 1991-92; and a vice-president of the New York Racing Association from 1994-97. He recently released an instructional DVD titled "Exotic Tickets," and is the author of several books including "Betting on Myself" and "Exotic Betting."